Dear all,
Filothei have prepared the feedback collection document: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CVBPVh5NOlLvclHJy45i2Rt6Pl9BSwWSunz…
Please, use it to give us (WP4 partners) specific feedback on technologies used in Year 2 interventions.
*Note you need to select the Sheet name with correct partner name.
Your contribution is needed because:
a) We will use it to improve the ExtenDT2 Platform before Year 3 interventions.
b) We need to report it in the Deliverable 4.3 before the end of September.
It would be great if you have it done by Sunday 15/09.
Thank you for your great cooperation!
Best wishes,
Filothei and Alisa
Dear Marianthi, dear Thea,
Cc OMT Team, as you will probably also have received this for information, and a similar one for D3.1.
This is Angel, our PO , ”re-opening up” the two deliverables on SyGMA , i.e, he has to reject the original v1 for both D3.1 and D5.1 so I can upload new updated versions in their place.
For everyone’s information: In SygGMA/EC Portal each deliverable title can only have one document uploaded against it .
In our project both D3.1 and D5.1 had second/final version due in M24, according to the application, as have a number of other deliverables.
(So we will need to go through this confusing “rejection” process, with other deliverables that have initial and second/final versions).
Hope this all makes sense.
Please inform your other team members who are not part of OMT.
Re D5.3
In any case we have heard from Angel, he seems happy with the progress of our project, and he seems fine that we will contact him again about D5.3 and its appendices towards the end of September.
Best regards
Shamim
From: Marianthi Grizioti <mgriziot(a)eds.uoa.gr> on behalf of Marianthi Grizioti <mgriziot(a)eds.uoa.gr>
Date: Monday, 2 September 2024 at 17:52
To: Shamim Patel <shamim.patel(a)lnu.se>
Subject: Fwd: For Action - Exten.D.T.2 - 101060231 - DLV-101060231 - Deliverable rejected
Hi Shamim
I just received this message from the portal. Do you know what this is and if we have to do something about it?
Best
Marianthi
---------- Forwarded message ---------
Από: European Commission <EC-NO-REPLY-GRANT-MANAGEMENT(a)nomail.ec.europa.eu<mailto:EC-NO-REPLY-GRANT-MANAGEMENT@nomail.ec.europa.eu>>
Date: Δευ 2 Σεπ 2024, 5:27 μ.μ.
Subject: For Action - Exten.D.T.2 - 101060231 - DLV-101060231 - Deliverable rejected
To: Marianthi Grizioti <mgriziot(a)eds.uoa.gr<mailto:mgriziot@eds.uoa.gr>>
Europa / Funding & Tenders Portal notification
Dear Madam/Sir,
We regret to inform you that the deliverable "D5.1 - Report on the activities plans for school interventions" for your above project has been rejected.
For more details, please log on to the Funding & Tenders Portal > My Project(s) ( https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/myare…) and click on Action > Manage Project.
Regards,
Grant Management Services
Please do not reply to this message
This message has been automatically generated by the Grant Management Services of the European Commission with the following configuration:
To:
Participant Contact
Cc:
Coordinator Contact
Priority:High
You can change your preferences on email alerts in the "Notifications" area of your Funding & Tenders Portal
If you want to change the frequency of receiving notifications with importance "Normal", you can do it in the Funding & Tenders Portal > My Notifications > Preferences
Hi Marianthi, Sofia, and All,
Thank you, at LNU, we believe the most practical and appropriate approach is as follows:
Each partner should respond directly to Marianthi, confirming whether or not it is acceptable to include their respective teachers' Activity Plans (APs) in the appendices, or advise of any further action required. This allows each partner to consult further with their teachers if needed.
To summarize:
- NKUA: 8 APs to confirm
- Katrien/UGent: 4 APs to confirm
- Sagun (in Thea’s absence): 2 APs to confirm
- Sofia/NTNU: 3 APs to confirm
- LNU/Marcelo: 1 AP to confirm
- TCD/Jake: 1 AP to confirm
The attached appendices should remain confidential for now.
I have removed the link in the D5.3 just shared with all our consortium
However, they were submitted to the EC Portal on Thursday, April 29, I have written to our PO to request that they be kept confidential temporarily. I have also informed him that we may need to make adjustments to the appendices and replace the link in the main deliverable.
This should not pose any issues.
We do need to address this as soon as possible though, and we should be ready to update him by the end of September if any changes are required.
Best regards,
Shamim
From: Sofia Papavlasopoulou <spapav(a)ntnu.no>
Date: Friday, 30 August 2024 at 18:46
To: Marianthi Grizioti <mgriziot(a)eds.uoa.gr>, "Exten.D.T.2_OMT_Mailing List" <extendt2_omt(a)lists.sunet.se>
Subject: [Extendt2_omt] Re: Reg. usage of Activity Plans in Del
Hi Marianthi,
Thank you for following up on this.
It depends on a few factors, for example in what each teacher gave consent, what they want (e.g. maybe they want their name to be written or not, or anything else), who wrote the activity plan (for example in some are only the researchers), how it is the process in each country etc....
So, it should be checked for the shared activity plans if and how they can appear publicly.
For NTNU, for two of the activity plans it should be fine (I will confirm as soon as possible), but in the third one, the names and a source (since it is used also by master students) should be added (I will give information).
Best,
Sofia
.ps I downloaded the deliverable from the shared folder and the links are not "clickable" except from the project's one, but maybe I do something wrong
________________________________
From: mgriziot(a)eds.uoa.gr <mgriziot(a)eds.uoa.gr> on behalf of Marianthi Grizioti <mgriziot(a)eds.uoa.gr>
Sent: 30 August 2024 17:09
To: Exten.D.T.2_OMT_Mailing List <extendt2_omt(a)lists.sunet.se>
Subject: [Extendt2_omt] Reg. usage of Activity Plans in Del
Dear all,
I don't know if this can cover us regarding the usage of teachers' Activity Plans in public reports, but in the consent forms writes that the collected data from the teacher includes
"Lesson activity plans and any supporting materials"
and then in the data usage section says that
"De-identified data may be used in reports, presentations and other research outputs, in which a randomly assigned pseudonym will be used."
So maybe we are ok? I don't know, what do you think?
Best,
Marianthi
Marianthi Grizioti (PhD)
Post-doc researcher & software developer
Educational Technology Lab (ETL)<http://etl.eds.uoa.gr/>
Department of Educational Studies
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
Research Gate<https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marianthi_Grizioti> | Academia <https://en-uoa-gr.academia.edu/MarianthiGrizioti> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/marianthi-grizioti-b0394038/>
Dear All
Attached you can find the draft minutes and WP updates from our OMT meeting on Friday.
Please check all Actions/To Dos that apply to you in the minutes and ppt slides - including deadlines for information requested for our half yearly meeting in Dublin
If you would like any additions or changes let me know by Thursday12 September.
---
Please note I will on leave from tomorrow afternoon (Tuesday 3 September) and back on Thursday 12 September.
Best regards
Shamim
-------------------------------------------------
Shamim Patel (ACA)
Project Manager | Exten.(D.T.)2 Project
Linnæus University
Office of External Relations
SE-351 95 Växjö | Sweden
M: +46 (0)705 898396 | lnu.se<https://lnu.se/en/>
-------------------------------------------------
Dear all,
I don't know if this can cover us regarding the usage of teachers' Activity
Plans in public reports, but in the consent forms writes that the collected
data from the teacher includes
"Lesson activity plans and any supporting materials"
and then in the data usage section says that
"De-identified data may be used in reports, presentations and other
research outputs, in which a randomly assigned pseudonym will be used."
So maybe we are ok? I don't know, what do you think?
Best,
Marianthi
Marianthi Grizioti (PhD)
Post-doc researcher & software developer
*Educational Technology Lab (ETL) <http://etl.eds.uoa.gr/> *
*Department of Educational Studies*
*National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece*
Research Gate <https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marianthi_Grizioti>
| Academia
<https://en-uoa-gr.academia.edu/MarianthiGrizioti>| LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/marianthi-grizioti-b0394038/>
Dear all,
I don't know if this can cover us regarding the usage of teachers' Activity
Plans in public reports, but in the consent forms writes that the collected
data from the teacher includes
"Lesson activity plans and any supporting materials"
and then in the data usage section says that
"De-identified data may be used in reports, presentations and other
research outputs, in which a randomly assigned pseudonym will be used."
So maybe we are ok? I don't know, what do you think?
Best,
Marianthi
Marianthi Grizioti (PhD)
Post-doc researcher & software developer
*Educational Technology Lab (ETL) <http://etl.eds.uoa.gr/> *
*Department of Educational Studies*
*National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece*
Research Gate <https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marianthi_Grizioti>
| Academia
<https://en-uoa-gr.academia.edu/MarianthiGrizioti>| LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/marianthi-grizioti-b0394038/>
Dear Carina,
As today marks your last day at TCD, Marcelo and I, along I am sure with the entire OMT team, want to extend our thanks for your hard work and valuable contributions to the Exten.(D.T.)2 project over the past two years. Your presence on the team will be missed.
We wish you the best of luck in your new position and all success in your future endeavors.
Best wishes,
Shamim and Marcelo
-------------------------------------------------
Coordinaton Team | Exten.(D.T.)2 Project
Linnæus University
Office of External Relations
SE-351 95 Växjö | Sweden
M: +46 (0)705 898396 | lnu.se<https://lnu.se/en/>
-------------------------------------------------
