Dear SI-PASS coördinator,
Does SI-PASS really work? Is it cost-effective? These are questions you might often answer
as a SI-PASS coordinator. Until now these questions have been studied with
quasi-experiments in which students who participate in SI-PASS are compared to students
who do not participate.
Sceptics might then ask if this is not a wrong comparison. Even if you control for
previous performance or motivation, there might be differences between these two types of
students that you are not taking into account. This is known as 'self-selection
bias'.
This month a study was published in Learning and Instruction which access to SI-PASS was
randomized in a large-scale field experiment in The Netherlands. The article is freely
available and shows that SI-PASS significantly improves grades even with moderate
attendance. The study also shows that the intervention is cost-effective and that its
effects can be considered large when the costs and scalability are taken into account.
Please feel free to share and use this publication to inform people about SI-PASS:
Effects of supplemental instruction on grades, mental well-being, and belonging: A field
experiment -
ScienceDirect<https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475…
Best wishes,
Izaak
Dr. Izaak Dekker
0628102259 | i.dekker(a)hva.nl | KSH07a09
Kenniscentrum Onderwijs en Opvoeding
Hogeschool van Amsterdam