We do have a plan to publish a paper on the validated instrument that is part of the pre-post survey, so we just need to be careful that there is no explicit overlap. I'm sure that should be possible, but just wanted to make sure you are aware of that and that 21st century kills are part of that survey. So there may potential overlap with "critical thinking, reflection, and empathy". We are going to do some statistical analysis of the final pre-post data, so it would make sense not to duplicate that, but if we are getting that done perhaps we can make sure to slice it the way you need it for this paper too. Would that be useful?

We just need to manage how the data may be used in both papers and that we reduce overlap of using the same data, or at least report on the same data but with different objectives.

Kind regards,

Dr Jake Byrne

Assistant Professor

Contemporary Teaching & Learning and Computing

Course Coordinator, Postgraduate Certificate in 21st Century Teaching and Learning - School of Education, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland

TCD Director, CHARM-EU https://www.charm-eu.eu/

Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland

Twitter: @JakeRowanByrne @CHARM_EU @SchoolofEdTCD

Confidentiality Note:

Privileged/confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to third parties without authorisation. In such cases, you should notify the office of the DPO immediately. Electronic mail to, from or within Trinity College may be the subject of a request under Freedom of Information or Data Protection legislation.

[External Email] This email originated outside of Trinity College Dublin. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello Thea,

Thank you for your email, I would love to contribute, too.

Related to the main question you posed, “What is the impact of engaging
with design thinking on students' critical thinking, reflection, and
empathy?”, I am sharing here a conference paper that we are going to
present at the Constructionism 2025 conference. The data is from a
vocational high school (for sample heterogeneity). The paper discusses the
reflective practices that emerge when students engage in learning
activities based on Design Thinking methodology and the role of feedback
activities in developing reflective and critical thinking.

It is based on a preliminary thematic analysis, but I can share more
insights and data on the case regarding reflection and critical thinking
if you think this is useful and relevant to what you have in mind to write
about.

Let me know what you think,
Best regards,
Christina

> Hi Thea,
>
> I am interested in contributing to that paper with data from the Greek
> interventions.
>
> Best,
>
> Marianthi
>
> Στις 5/15/2025 10:47 AM, ο/η Christothea.Herodotou [She/Her] via
> Extendt2_all έγραψε:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Hope you are well, in the roadmap of publications doc
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1a8eOpdMNTXBlxsRbRx2JRbQKVLNU0Yj1PxRFO4xqHpQ/edit?tab=t.0
>> I expressed interest in writing a paper about:
>>
>> “What is the impact of engaging with design thinking on students'
>> critical thinking, reflection, and empathy?”
>>
>> I’m thinking of collating survey data from across partners and conduct
>> a statistical analysis of pre/post responses considering for
>> contextual factors such as country, school type, student performance,
>> age, gender. This will address some of the criticism we received from
>> mis4TEL reviewers last year regarding the paper we published and which
>> we addressed by adding the below:
>>
>> “In addition, we aim to address two limitations of this study: a)
>> analyse data considering for the sample’s heterogeneity e.g, different
>> ages,
>>
>> backgrounds, school type, locations, enabling comparisons between
>> e.g., different types of schools, and an understanding of the
>> conditions under which the proposed intervention may work (or not) well”
>>
>> *Would you be interested in contributing?*Pls let me know and I can
>> draft a plan with activities and meetings to take this forward.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Thea
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Extendt2_all mailing list --extendt2_all@lists.sunet.se
>> To unsubscribe send an email toextendt2_all-leave@lists.sunet.se
> --
>
> Marianthi Grizioti (PhD)
>
> Assistant Professor
>
> /Department of Educational Studies, School of Philosophy/
>
> /National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece/
>
> /Educational Technology Lab (ETL)/ <http://etl.eds.uoa.gr/>//
>
> Research Gate
> <https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marianthi_Grizioti> | Academia
> <https://en-uoa-gr.academia.edu/MarianthiGrizioti>| LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/marianthi-grizioti-b0394038/>
>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> www.avast.com_______________________________________________
> Extendt2_all mailing list -- extendt2_all@lists.sunet.se
> To unsubscribe send an email to extendt2_all-leave@lists.sunet.se
>

--
Christina Gkreka (PhD)
Educational Technology Lab (ETL)
Department of Educational Studies
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece